Adaptive Lower Bound for Testing Monotonicity on the Line

نویسنده

  • Aleksandrs Belovs
چکیده

In the property testing model, the task is to distinguish objects possessing some property from the objects that are far from it. One of such properties is monotonicity, when the objects are functions from one poset to another. It is an active area of research. Recently, Pallavoor, Raskhodnikova and Varma (ITCS’17) proposed an ε-tester for monotonicity of a function f : [n] → [r], whose complexity depends on the size of the range as O ( log r ε ) . In this paper, we prove a nearly matching lower bound of Ω ( log r log log r ) for adaptive two-sided testers. Additionally, we give an alternative proof of the Ω(εd logn−ε log ε) lower bound for testing monotonicity on the hypergrid [n] due to Chackrabarty and Seshadhri (RANDOM’13).

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

D ec 2 01 4 Boolean function monotonicity testing requires ( almost ) n 1 / 2 non - adaptive queries Xi

We prove a lower bound of Ω(n), for all c > 0, on the query complexity of (two-sided error) non-adaptive algorithms for testing whether an n-variable Boolean function is monotone versus constant-far from monotone. This improves a Ω̃(n) lower bound for the same problem that was recently given in [CST14] and is very close to Ω(n), which we conjecture is the optimal lower bound for this model.

متن کامل

An Optimal Lower Bound for Monotonicity Testing over Hypergrids

For positive integers n,d, the hypergrid [n]d is equipped with the coordinatewise product partial ordering denoted by ≺. A function f : [n]d → N is monotone if ∀x ≺ y, f (x)≤ f (y). A function f is ε-far from monotone if at least an ε fraction of values must be changed to make f monotone. Given a parameter ε , a monotonicity tester must distinguish with high probability a monotone function from...

متن کامل

2 TESTING MONOTONICITY : O ( n ) UPPER BOUND

1 Overview 1.1 Last time • Proper learning for P implies property testing of P (generic, but quite inefficient) • Testing linearity (over GF[2]), i.e. P = {all parities}: (optimal) O 1-query 1-sided non-adaptive tester. • Testing monotonicity (P = {all monotone functions}: an efficient O n-query 1-sided non-adaptive tester.

متن کامل

Testing monotonicity of distributions over general partial orders

We investigate the number of samples required for testing the monotonicity of a distribution with respect to an arbitrary underlying partially ordered set. Our first result is a nearly linear lower bound for the sample complexity of testing monotonicity with respect to the poset consisting of a directed perfect matching. This is the first nearly linear lower bound known for a natural non-symmet...

متن کامل

Distance-Sensitive Property Testing Lower Bounds

In this paper, we consider several property testing problems and ask how the query complexity depends on the distance parameter ǫ. We achieve new lower bounds in this setting for the problems of testing whether a function is monotone and testing whether the function has low Fourier degree. For monotonicity testing, our lower bound matches the recent upper bound of Chakrabarty and Seshadhri [12].

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • CoRR

دوره abs/1801.08709  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2018